Maple wrote:No, its all about the money.
Always!
No offence, but I find that a little hard to believe to be honest.
Funny enough, the person who I find has explained the artistic temprement the best is Stephen King.
In the foreword of his book Skeleton Crew, he talks about a friend who asked him one day why he bothered, and here's a couple of quotes from his answering statement...............
All the same,you don't do it for the money,or you're a monkey.You don't think of the bottom line,or you're a monkey.You don't think of it in terms of hourly wage,yearly wage,ever life time wage,or you're a monkey.In the end you don't even do it for love,although it would be nice to think so.You do it because to not do it is suicide.And while that is tough,there are compensations I could never tell Wyatt about,because he is not that kind of guy.
I don't need to draw you a picture,do I?You don't do it for money;you do it because it saves you from feeling bad.A man or a woman able to turn his or her back on something like that is just a monkey,thats all.The story paid me by letting me get back to sleep when I felt as if I couldn't.I paid the story back by getting it concrete,which it wanted to be.The rest is just side effects.
I've used the above as examples before on forums so I had them to hand, unfotunatly the most compelling argument SK makes is not quoted online (as far as I know) and i've not got the book (think it might have been Different Seasons) to hand right now.
I'll
try and paraphrase to get the meaning over.
Humans are highly suseptable to a mania known as hobbies.
The teacher may do gravestone rubbings in her spare time, the chemist might be a coin collector, the shop assistant might be a photographer.
Now and again some of these people become so good hobbies they are able to make them into a proffession. The teacher may be able to move onto the lecture circuit, the shop assistand may be able to support themselves by taking photographs.
It's hard to think of something we enjoy as a real job, so by mutual consent we call these proffessional hobbies "the arts"
The difference is, that all these people, every one, would continue to do what they do even if they were no longer paid for their services.
In fact many would continue to do it even if their art were banned. The chemist, rather than hand in his collection would no doubt put them in a waterproof container and store them in the cistern of the toilet, to be taken out and looked over in the dead of night.
Don't get me wrong, money is a useful thing to have (let's not desend into total fantasy just yet) and everybody needs to eat, but the money is a side effect that allows you to keep practicing your art.
You do it because you need to do it, because it's in you to do it, and that you can't imagine what it would be like to not be doing it.
That's the way I feel about it anyway
I can honestly say that if I was never paid another penny to sing another word, i'd still be doing it.
And I suspect that if it really was 100% about money, you would not feel such warmth and pride towards your students.
And even if you were never paid to do so again, i'll give you whaever odds you want that you would not go through the rest of your life without picking up another instrument